How to Figure Out Which Content Format to Make More Of
Run a content-mix analysis: group your videos by format (long-form, Shorts, tutorial, vlog, etc.) and compare each group’s average views, retention, and subscribers gained — not raw totals. The format with the best per-video averages and subscriber pull is where to invest, even if another format has more total views from sheer volume.
Channels often spread effort evenly across formats out of habit, when the data shows one format does most of the work. A content-mix analysis tells you where your effort actually pays, so you stop subsidizing formats that quietly underperform.
Step by step
- 1
Tag every video by format
Group your uploads into clear buckets — long-form, Shorts, tutorial, vlog, listicle, whatever fits your channel. Be consistent so the comparison is clean.
- 2
Compare averages, not totals
For each format, calculate average views per video, not total views. Totals just reward whichever format you have made most of. Averages reveal which format performs per unit of effort.
- 3
Layer in retention and subscribers gained
A format can pull views but few subscribers, or vice versa. Check average view duration and subscribers gained per format — some formats grow the channel, others only entertain.
- 4
Weigh effort against return
Factor production cost. If long-form averages 3x the views of Shorts but takes 6x the time, Shorts may be the better return — or the reverse. Return per hour, not just per video.
- 5
Rebalance deliberately
Shift your mix toward the format with the best return and subscriber pull, while keeping enough of the others to stay discoverable. Re-run the analysis quarterly as your channel evolves.
Common mistakes
- ✕Comparing total views by format, which just reflects how many of each you have published.
- ✕Optimizing for views while ignoring which format actually gains subscribers.
- ✕Dropping a format entirely instead of rebalancing — Shorts and long-form often feed each other.
- ✕Running the analysis once and never revisiting it as the audience changes.
Let NEXORA do this for you
Content-mix analysis is a native NEXORA pattern. It breaks your library down by format and shows, for example, that long videos average far more views than Shorts on your channel — or the opposite — with the retention and subscriber data behind each, so the rebalancing decision is grounded in your numbers.
Try NEXORA free →Frequently Asked Questions
Should I focus on Shorts or long-form YouTube videos?
It depends on your channel’s data, not the general trend. Compare the average views, retention, and subscribers gained per video for each format on your own channel. Shorts often win on reach but convert fewer long-term subscribers; long-form usually builds deeper loyalty but costs more to make. Many channels use Shorts to feed discovery and long-form to retain.
Why compare averages instead of total views by format?
Totals just reward whichever format you have made the most of — if you have 200 Shorts and 20 long-form videos, Shorts will "win" on totals regardless of quality. Average views per video controls for that and shows which format actually performs per unit of effort, which is what your production time should follow.
How often should I redo a content-mix analysis?
Roughly quarterly, or after any major format experiment. Audience preferences and YouTube’s surfaces shift over time, and a format that underperformed six months ago may work now. Re-running it keeps your mix aligned with what your current audience rewards rather than a stale snapshot.
Want strategy from your own analytics?
NEXORA is an AI agent you plug into your channel — free during beta.
Try NEXORA FreeFurther reading: see YouTube Shorts vs long-form in 2026.